The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
isList(n____(V121464_0, V221465_0)) →⁺ U11(U41(isList(V121464_0), activate(V221465_0)))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0,0].
The pumping substitution is [V121464_0 / n____(V121464_0, V221465_0)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)